divergent geometry scanning (equilinear and equiangular), the \emph{focal
length ratio} should be set at \texttt{2} or more to avoid artifacts.
+
\subsection{Parallel Geometry}\label{geometryparallel}\index{Concepts,Scanner,Geometries,Parallel}
As mentioned above, the focal length is not used in this simple
the \emph{scan diameter ratio}. If values of less than \texttt{1} are
used for these two variables, significant distortions will occur.
+
\subsection{Divergent Geometries}\label{geometrydivergent}\index{Concepts,Scanner,Geometries,Divergent}
\subsubsection{Overview}
Next consider the case of equilinear (second generation) and equiangular
\caption{Equilinear and equiangular geometries.}
\end{figure}
+
\subsubsection{Fan Beam Angle}
For these divergent beam geometries, the \emph{fan beam angle} needs
to be calculated. For real-world CT scanners, this is fixed at the
time of manufacture. \ctsim, however, calculates the \emph{fan beam angle},
\latexonly{$\alpha$,}\latexignore{\emph{alpha},}
from the diameter of the \emph{scan diameter} and the \emph{focal length}
-\latexignore{\\$$\emph{alpha = 2 x asin ( (Sd / 2) / F)}$$\\}
+\latexignore{\\$$\emph{alpha = 2 x asin ( (Sd / 2) / f)}$$\\}
\latexonly{$$\alpha = 2 \sin^{-1} ((s_d / 2) / f)$$}
This is illustrated in figure 2.3.
\begin{figure}
\caption{Calculation of $\alpha$}
\end{figure}
+
Empiric testing with \ctsim\ shows that for very large \emph{fan beam angles},
greater than approximately
-\latexonly{$120^{\circ}$,}\latexignore{120 degrees,}
+\latexonly{$120^\circ$,}\latexignore{120 degrees,}
there are significant artifacts. The primary way to manage the
\emph{fan beam angle} is by varying the \emph{focal length} since the
\emph{scan diameter} by the size of the phantom.
+$$s_d = p_d v_R s_R$$
+If $v_r = 1$ and $s_R = 1$, then $s_d = p_d$. Further, $f = f_R v_R (p_d / 2)$
+Plugging these equations into the above equation,
+$$\alpha = 2\,\sin^{-1} \frac{p_d / 2}{f_R (p_d / 2)}$$
+$$\alpha = 2\,\sin^{-1} (1 / f_R)$$
+
+Thus, $\alpha$ depends only upon the \emph{focal length ratio}.
+
\subsubsection{Detector Array Size}
In general, you do not need to be concerned with the detector array
size. It is automatically calculated by \ctsim. The size of the
\end{figure}
An example of the this geometry is in figure 2.5.
+
\subsubsection{Examples of Geometry Settings}
Consider increasing the focal length ratio to two leaving the
field of view ratio as 1, as in Figure 4. Now the detectors array is
Backprojection is the process of ``smearing'' the filtered projections over
the reconstructing image. Various levels of interpolation can be specified.
In general, the trade-off is between quality and execution time.
-